Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Lefthanded49's avatar

So far, the three back system is a big improvement for the defense, which is a good place to start building the team this year. Fory looks like a really good pickup and can play LWB, and presumably Mosquera can on the other side, with Antony or E. Miller as backup. Ayala should start and presumably Ortiz, although I'd like to see a little more from him. I see skill but not a high work rate. Da Costa can play above the other two midfielders or side by side with Ortiz with Ayala underneath. Then you have the two forwards. I'd stick with the three back system, even with Da Costa in the fold as a 10. Phil will be tempted to go back to a 4-2-3-1 because he now has a "10." Based on your report Jeremy, and from what I've seen, he seems like a 8/10 which would work in the 3-5-2 (what they are running now). He can be like a Barella for Inter. I think being a 10 in the 4-2-3-1 would put a lot of pressure on him to produce big numbers and be the guy, whereas the other formation would take the creative load off of him and would cater to his strengths like ball progression and passing in tight areas.

Expand full comment
Bethany Rob's avatar

I am struck by how much this seems to be a brand new start for PTFC...

Like 'em or not, the FO has turned this roster in a very new direction, with much more height and speed from the OBs forward. Because of injuries and missing players, Phil is playing 3-back lineups, and seems to have cancelled zonal marking on set pieces, with positive defensive results. And now, Evander's departure (and Jona's/JDMs injuries) signals strongly that PTFC 2025 is gonna start with a pretty different look.

With all our speed there can be high pressing aplenty; Lassiter, Antony, Mora and especially Kelsy really go after guys with the ball at the back and have created lots of turnovers. At the same time, the MF is playing better defense in support of the back line. There are still gaps being exploited along the top of the 18 yd box, but so far we look much more cohesive and defensively plausible.

Expand full comment
2 more comments...

No posts